Can not see how zaha attempt on goal after benteke cross can not be considered a shot.if goalie doesn't save it's a goal. Shot was from inside the penalty box and was never a cross. This needs to be pursued as William Hill can not claim was not a shot on target. Their wording for a cross is a medium to long range pass from a wide area.it certainly was not that.
Hi all I am in the same boat am a William gold member and when I emailed them last night even there own staff said they know the bet has been settled wrong and have sent evidence to the trading team so they can correct this !!! shocking from Hills and they will be losing my account if this is not reversed !!!
Actually maybe it’s who scored who should be reviewing that decision, who actually made the decision it’s a cross?.. maybe who scored could enlighten us?
It’s a blatant fudge of their own definitions, saw Harry Kane 6yards from byline against Barca last year strike the ball with bend that was on target from 35 yards, shot on target!.. corner kick!.. straight in...shot on target... it’s a fudge
I just re watched the first 10 minutes of the second half and even the commentator says that was the first attempt on target from the follow up of Benteke’s cross... So not only are the commentators saying it was, other betting sites paying out, I feel we are being robbed!!!
@wotty I’ve escalated it to support@willhill.com and second_opinion@willhill.com stating their definition of a cross vs shot on target with screenshots of the shot in question. I’ll let you know the outcome
@Battman1984 if they said the microchip and magnetic field used for goalie tech said it was off target then well it’s swallow it and move on... it clearly isn’t mid-long range and is under there definition a shot on target
@Lcarse the decision to call cross is based upon there belief of the players intent, it wasn’t mid to long range and was on target, o won’t bet bet again with them if they can’t overuse a blatant mistake. I’ve shown several people, all believe it’s a shot on target. Customer service OWN GOAL!
This is the response I just had on messenger: Sources have Zaha shots on Target as one so that is what we have settled on.
Below are the definition of football terms:
**A cross is a medium- to-long-range pass from a wide area of the field towards the centre of the field near the opponent's goal. A cross even if dealt with by the keeper is NOT a shot on target.
**A shot on target is defined as being any goal attempt that resulted in a goal being scored or would have resulted in a goal being scored but was stopped by a goalkeeper's save or by a defender who is the last player.
· Shots directly hitting the frame of the goal are not counted as shots on target, unless the ball goes in and is awarded as a goal.
· Shots blocked by another player, who is not the last-man, are not counted as shots on target
Ive been asked to send a video in. i have done but why should i? I have had an email back saying they will review it. I advise anyone disputing it to do the same. Here is the email.
second_opinion@willhill.com
@wotty I rang them for clarification and they’re saying it was a cross? so if a cross goes in the goal it’s not a shot on target, it’s cobblers according to there own definitions, it’s gone for review at William hill. I’m as bamboozled as anyone over it. I won’t bet stays with willhills if this is there final answer for sure.⚽️ It’s a laughable contradiction.
Zaha also hit a poor cross in first half too close to goalie that might and gone in top corner. I have gone back and recorded it. defenite shot on goal in 51 min
Your stats also stat Benteke not hitting the woodwork? It was Benteke’s Shot/Cross that hit the post which created the Zaha shot on target in the 51st minute
@wotty@wotty i had the same bet, I watched the game and it was clearly a shot on target in the 51st min. I had a friend text me a couple of minutes after saying his Zaha over 0.5 shots on target with bet365 had been settled, so this clearly states it was a shot on target
@10pintbowyer@wotty i had the same bet, I watched the game and it was clearly a shot on target in the 51st min. I had a friend text me a couple of minutes after saying his Zaha over 0.5 shots on target with bet365 had been settled, so this clearly states it was a shot on target
whoscored really need to sort their ratings out when it comes to GKs Guaita gets an 8.5 rating for conceding a goal and making a bunch of straight forward saves. I cant remember him making a single good save in the game.
CP's attack is horrible. Without Schlupp and van Aanholt, Zaha is the only one left who can actually cause problems for Brighton. On the other hand, Brighton is in a decent form, making promising results against Arsenal and Wolverhampton. Their set piece attacks are threatening and field plays are smooth. With home team's fine defense a draw is possible, but I can see away team taking all the points here. 0-1 Brighton win.
Can not see how zaha attempt on goal after benteke cross can not be considered a shot.if goalie doesn't save it's a goal. Shot was from inside the penalty box and was never a cross. This needs to be pursued as William Hill can not claim was not a shot on target. Their wording for a cross is a medium to long range pass from a wide area.it certainly was not that.
Didn’t even offer stake refund, I’ve asked to escalate the complaint... I think we should go to gambling ombudsmen for independant opinion?
iv just been on the phone to them they aint having none of it said they will refund y stake will never be betting with hills again f*cking joke !!!
It’s all a joke pal they emailing me now saying we can refund your stake so obvs they know they are wrong but I ain’t accepting that
I’ve asked him on his Facebook ⚽️
Who knows wolf pickle shot zaha?.. I wanna know whether he intended shot or cross?... somebody must know him?⚽️
Hi all I am in the same boat am a William gold member and when I emailed them last night even there own staff said they know the bet has been settled wrong and have sent evidence to the trading team so they can correct this !!! shocking from Hills and they will be losing my account if this is not reversed !!!
@WilfZaha1 fair play! It’s a disgrace.
s
Actually maybe it’s who scored who should be reviewing that decision, who actually made the decision it’s a cross?.. maybe who scored could enlighten us?
What happened to common sense and customer service?.. I’m f£&king annoyed now
It’s a blatant fudge of their own definitions, saw Harry Kane 6yards from byline against Barca last year strike the ball with bend that was on target from 35 yards, shot on target!.. corner kick!.. straight in...shot on target... it’s a fudge
Robbed will not be using William hill again
I just re watched the first 10 minutes of the second half and even the commentator says that was the first attempt on target from the follow up of Benteke’s cross... So not only are the commentators saying it was, other betting sites paying out, I feel we are being robbed!!!
@Battman1984 im so annoyed
@wotty I’ve escalated it to support@willhill.com and second_opinion@willhill.com stating their definition of a cross vs shot on target with screenshots of the shot in question. I’ll let you know the outcome
@Battman1984 if they said the microchip and magnetic field used for goalie tech said it was off target then well it’s swallow it and move on... it clearly isn’t mid-long range and is under there definition a shot on target
@Lcarse the decision to call cross is based upon there belief of the players intent, it wasn’t mid to long range and was on target, o won’t bet bet again with them if they can’t overuse a blatant mistake. I’ve shown several people, all believe it’s a shot on target. Customer service OWN GOAL!
This is the response I just had on messenger: Sources have Zaha shots on Target as one so that is what we have settled on. Below are the definition of football terms: **A cross is a medium- to-long-range pass from a wide area of the field towards the centre of the field near the opponent's goal. A cross even if dealt with by the keeper is NOT a shot on target. **A shot on target is defined as being any goal attempt that resulted in a goal being scored or would have resulted in a goal being scored but was stopped by a goalkeeper's save or by a defender who is the last player. · Shots directly hitting the frame of the goal are not counted as shots on target, unless the ball goes in and is awarded as a goal. · Shots blocked by another player, who is not the last-man, are not counted as shots on target
Ive been asked to send a video in. i have done but why should i? I have had an email back saying they will review it. I advise anyone disputing it to do the same. Here is the email. second_opinion@willhill.com
@wotty it’s a shot on target and asked for a re-review on the grounds that they’re deciding intent of player rather than there written definition.
I also had this bet. Zaha to have over 1 shot on target. If the goalkeeper is removed it goes in. That's a shot. Will this be reviewed or is it final?
Useless bentecke hits the wood work and they don’t have that once stats either have they got anything right
funny how i cant get through at willy hill.
@wotty I rang them for clarification and they’re saying it was a cross? so if a cross goes in the goal it’s not a shot on target, it’s cobblers according to there own definitions, it’s gone for review at William hill. I’m as bamboozled as anyone over it. I won’t bet stays with willhills if this is there final answer for sure.⚽️ It’s a laughable contradiction.
@Lcarse tell them ignore the cross one let them lie the way out of that but they can’t get etc out of the one on the 51st min it’s a shot and a save
@10pintbowyer that’s the one they’re calling a cross???
@wotty same pal keep saying bets settled via who score I’m like I have proof and they still not taking me on, I will get to the bottom of this rip off
Are you going to rectify your stats, this seems like a clear scam it’s clear has day I’m the high lights
Zaha also hit a poor cross in first half too close to goalie that might and gone in top corner. I have gone back and recorded it. defenite shot on goal in 51 min
Your stats also stat Benteke not hitting the woodwork? It was Benteke’s Shot/Cross that hit the post which created the Zaha shot on target in the 51st minute
Ive had a bet on Zaha to have over 1 shot on target and he has in the 51st and 76 minutes. Why is it showing a losing bet at willy hill???? Not happy
@wotty @wotty i had the same bet, I watched the game and it was clearly a shot on target in the 51st min. I had a friend text me a couple of minutes after saying his Zaha over 0.5 shots on target with bet365 had been settled, so this clearly states it was a shot on target
Please tell me why you have zaha for one shot He hit target on 50 min and then scored a goal that’s 2 shots right
@10pintbowyer @wotty i had the same bet, I watched the game and it was clearly a shot on target in the 51st min. I had a friend text me a couple of minutes after saying his Zaha over 0.5 shots on target with bet365 had been settled, so this clearly states it was a shot on target
whoscored really need to sort their ratings out when it comes to GKs Guaita gets an 8.5 rating for conceding a goal and making a bunch of straight forward saves. I cant remember him making a single good save in the game.
3-2 Benteke to score
CP's attack is horrible. Without Schlupp and van Aanholt, Zaha is the only one left who can actually cause problems for Brighton. On the other hand, Brighton is in a decent form, making promising results against Arsenal and Wolverhampton. Their set piece attacks are threatening and field plays are smooth. With home team's fine defense a draw is possible, but I can see away team taking all the points here. 0-1 Brighton win.
X
1-0
Palace have had the fewest shots on target - so is there going to be two go’s tonight? 0-1
boring 0-0
Unless Brighton win by just one goal Arsenal drop down to 10th.
2-1 Zaha !
Surely draw