|
Created a high number of chances relative to their possession
|
(Team has no significant strengths) |
|
Were effective at creating goalscoring opportunities from counter attacks
|
|
|
Were effective at creating goalscoring opportunities from set-pieces
|
|
|
Were aggressive
|
Were aggressive
|
|
Lost possession often
|
|
|
Gave away a lot of free-kicks around the box
|
|
|
Attacked down the left side
|
Played with width
|
|
Had a high shot frequency when in possession
|
Attacked through the middle
|
|
Favoured long balls
|
Dominated possession
|
|
Favoured short passing
|
Why wasn't Havertz substituted ?
Over 2.5 goals @ 1.91 Odds
2-1 Forest
.I can't see a draw here, Chelsea win this one easy Havertz has been fine and Sterling looked better last time out. Kepa has been solid and Forest while unlucky at times, haven't been clinical enough.
Good luck Chelsea F.C.!