Created a high number of chances relative to their possession
|
(Team has no significant strengths) |
Were effective at creating goalscoring opportunities from long shot situations
|
|
Were effective at creating goalscoring opportunities from the flanks
|
|
Were effective at creating goalscoring opportunities from set-pieces
|
|
Were strong at finishing
|
|
Were caught offside often
|
Were poor at finishing
|
|
Gave away a lot of free-kicks around the box
|
|
Were caught offside often
|
|
Commited a high number of individual errors
|
Had a large quantity of possession in their opponent's half
|
Favoured long shots
|
Attacked through the middle
|
Attacked down the left side
|
Had a high shot frequency when in possession
|
Favoured through balls
|
oh, that was a close game!
Just because you haven't given any assists or made any goals doesn't mean you've had a bad game. Besides more playing time means more chances to get the rating up. More touches, tackles, key passes, ... get you a higher rating. Less opportunities in less time.
4-0 for chelsea..
Martin down. I repeat martin down!
just like the Leeds game, this match will be a blowout especially with Mata's form
Guzan error led to goal!!!! which one
big win..KTBFFH!!
What is going on with the ratings? How come Moses has 7,5 considering he hasn't done ANYTHING in the FULL 90 minutes, whereas Mata and Piazon have done more in less time and have worse ratings? I have no idea how Moses' rating is that high anyways, I thought it'd be tops 6,5.
3-2 chelsea, only if benteke plays well if he doesnt then 3-1 chelsea
3-2 Villa,you heard it here first
I think Villa might be able to nick this one they have been playing well recently, 2-1 villa