I do understand it was due to "later analysis" but his match was far from perfect, and 10 is the perfect score is it not? I thought this was a site based on statistical analysis and not based on personal opinions. His match was undeniably far from perfect, he had only 76% pass accuracy, completely missed 55.5% of his shots, only converted 11.1% of his shots. It's impossible not to compare his performance to that of Messi yesterday (hitting the bar IS missing).
Ronaldo: 2 KP, 2 Drb, 1 goal, 1 assist, 76% pass acc, 11.1% chance conversion. Rating: 10.0
Messi: 3 KP, 4 Drb, 2 goals, 0 assists, 89% pass acc, 28.5% chance conversion,. Rating: 9.92
What on earth is going on here? Messi also sometimes gets his rating overrated after matches, but this site should at least be consistent on the ratings it gives. I can't understand this "after match interference". The rating should be based on what they've done only statistically, at least that's what I thought this site would be based on.
10 for Ronaldo?? That's weird. Had a great game, but surely a 10 (perfect rating)for that performance is absurd, even preposterous no?
You should also consider, that he gave an assist and 2 of those shots hit the bar. And besides being a constant threat to Atletico's defense during the whole match, he also did a good job helping out in defense occasionally (look at his defensive statistics). Bottom line, his performance was far the best in tonight's match, his goal and assist were decisive and his attitude was also admirable.
PS: my room is not filled with his posters, only trying to state facts. Also there would be like at least 15 players from Real squad that I'd prefer to meet and have an autograph than him.