I do understand it was due to "later analysis" but his match was far from perfect, and 10 is the perfect score is it not? I thought this was a site based on statistical analysis and not based on personal opinions. His match was undeniably far from perfect, he had only 76% pass accuracy, completely missed 55.5% of his shots, only converted 11.1% of his shots. It's impossible not to compare his performance to that of Messi yesterday (hitting the bar IS missing).
Ronaldo: 2 KP, 2 Drb, 1 goal, 1 assist, 76% pass acc, 11.1% chance conversion. Rating: 10.0
Messi: 3 KP, 4 Drb, 2 goals, 0 assists, 89% pass acc, 28.5% chance conversion,. Rating: 9.92
What on earth is going on here? Messi also sometimes gets his rating overrated after matches, but this site should at least be consistent on the ratings it gives. I can't understand this "after match interference". The rating should be based on what they've done only statistically, at least that's what I thought this site would be based on.
10 for Ronaldo?? That's weird. Had a great game, but surely a 10 (perfect rating)for that performance is absurd, even preposterous no?