Created a high number of chances relative to their possession
|
(Team has no significant strengths) |
Were effective at creating goalscoring opportunities from long shot situations
|
|
Were effective at creating goalscoring opportunities from the flanks
|
|
Were poor at finishing
|
Were poor at finishing
|
|
Were aggressive
|
|
Lost possession often
|
Had a large quantity of possession in their opponent's half
|
Played with width
|
Favoured long shots
|
Attacked down the left side
|
Attacked through the middle
|
Favoured crossing the ball
|
Dominated possession
|
Favoured long balls
|
soccerway.com/news/2014/January/30/mourinho-mocks-19th-century-west-ham/
ahahaha stupid chelsea
Fucking hell them stats are unreal
39 SHOTS and they still didn't score. Wow!
Beast game from Adrian.
0-0
@Patricovic F@ck off you c@nt.
Poor chelski, mourinho is rubbish, so is the team and their referees.
2-0
Chelsea 3-0 West Ham
Reid is nearly up to fitness!!! Kia Kaha, New Zealand pride!!! YNWA!!!
1-0 for Chelsea
tough match for the hammers, but I hope they win!!!
1-1
Chelsea need to watch out against complacency... +austin4sports says ...the likes of Hazard,Willian,Oscar,Eto and Matic are making Chelsea a very strong side...domestically and abroad.I said on my website that,Chelsea would win...but it would be very tight.